Email sent - Mon 03/09/2018 10:54
Information Commissioners Office
Under protection of the FOIA 2000 please provide me with copies of the following
1. All correspondence between the ICO and David Lidington ref the recent changes to sect 45 of FOIA
2. Records of all phone calls, meetings etc and personal notes from Ms Denham to the Queen on same subject.
3. Copies of all correspondence from your office pertaining to sect 45 changes and responses from the Cabinet Office. This request is neither vexatious, wide or unfocused.
Alan M Dransfield
Email sent - Thu 26/07/2018 20:17
Attn Karla Bailey Lead Case Officer
I now wish to elevate my complaint to the next level of the ICO complaints procedure, as I fervently believe the ICO have breached my Information rights by refusing my Subject Access Request ( SAR) on grounds my request is Manifestly Unreasonable.
No person applying a right and proper mind could refuse my SAR under such exemptions.
As you are aware, the ICO has consistently refused my FOI requests under section 14/1 vexatious exemption and now for the first time my SAR has been refused. It is consistently obvious to me that ICO senior managers including Elizabeth Denham are acting in concert to harass me. At best, your refusal decision is a Wednesbury Principled decision, and at worst, a decision to pervert the course of justice. I suggest the latter.
In the event I have not received a response to this letter within 14 days, I intend to pursue a private prosecution commencing at Chester Magistrate Court under protection of The Fraud Act 2006 and the Data Act 98
Alan M Dransfield
Email sent - Sat 12/05/2018 20:39
Information Commissioner Elizabeth Denham
As you are aware, the ICO have instructed court bailiffs to recover nearly £4000 legal costs in connection with The Court of Appeal Case C3/1855/ 15th May, Dransfield v ICO.
Are you not aware that a public authority cannot use taxpayers money to seek legal redress?
Therefore, please advise your bailiffs to cease and desist harassing me for such legal costs.
I will take this opportunity in submitting a FOIA request to the ICO for all cases in which the ICO have pursued legal costs against any FOIA complainant/requester since Jan 2013.
Yours sincerelylan Dransfield
Email sent - Sat 24/03/2018 22:58
FOIA REF CAMBRIDGE ANALYTICA (CA)
Under protection of the FOIA please provide me with the following information ref the subject title.
1.A copy of the ICO application for the warrant.
2.A copy of the Warrant to search CA.
3.A copy of the Method Statement for the raid
4.A copy of the Risk Assessment for the raid.
5.A copy of the invoice for the combat ICO jackets.
6.A full list of all items confiscated.
Alan M Dransfield
Email sent - Fri 02/03/2018 08:52
Ms Elizabeth Denham
Please see the following statement from the Anglian Water Authority, who claims they have no liability for the FOIA 2000.
Such statements are, at best, misinformation and at worst published to circumvent the FOIA 2000. It beggars belief the Anglian Water Authority would publish this statement on their website. To my knowledge all the other water companies are in full compliance with the FOIA 2000. I expect the ICO to issue a heavy fine against the Anglian Water Authority for their willful breach of Section 77 of the said act. Quite frankly, I think the conduct of their CEO Peter Simpson is reprehensible.
Alan M Dransfieldhttp://www.anglianwater.co.uk/about-us/information-requests.aspx